The facts before the court are conflicting and uncertain, and for that reason do not warrant the issuance of a writ of mandamus. Stevens v. Fellows, 70 N.H. 148, 150; Stearns v. Barrett, 1 Mason 153; High Ex. Rem., s. 9; 19 Am. . Eng. Enc. Law (2d ed.) 726, 727, and numerous authorities there cited.
Case discharged.
All concurred.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
