History
  • No items yet
midpage
Larned v. Beal
23 A. 149
| N.H. | 1889
|
Check Treatment

It is not material in this case whether the corporation de facto was a corporation de jure or not. A want of *Page 185 regularity in its organization would not affect the validity of its contract with the plaintiff, and would not give him, against its members, as unincorporated persons, an action on a contract which he made with them as a corporation. S. F. Bridge v. Fisk, 23 N.H. 171, 178; Ossipee Manf'g Co. v. Canney, 54 N.H. 295, 312; 313; Saunders v. Farmer, 62 N.H. 572; Jewell v. Gilbert, 64 N.H. 13, 18; Case v. Kelly, 133 U.S. 21, 28; Mor. Corp., ss. 744-755.

Judgment for the defendants.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Larned v. Beal
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1889
Citation: 23 A. 149
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.