32:T475,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Larned v. Beal, 23 A. 149","datePublished":"1889-06-05","legislationDate":"1889-06-05","citation":"Larned v. Beal, 23 A. 149 (N.H. 1889)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of New Hampshire","description":"Read the full text of Larned v. Beal (Larned v. Beal, 23 A. 149 (N.H. 1889)). This legal opinion, filed in 1889-06-05, from the Supreme Court of New Hampshire discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/larned-v-beal--3554054"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/larned-v-beal--3554054","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Larned v. Beal, Supreme Court of New Hampshire, Larned v. Beal, 23 A. 149 (N.H. 1889)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T44d, Doe, C. J.

It is not material in this case whether the corporation de facto was a corporation de jure or not. A want of *185 regularity in its organization would not affect the validity of its contract with the plaintiff, and would not give him, against its members, as unincorporated persons, an action on a contract which he made with them as a corporation. S. F. Bridge v. Fisk, 28 N. H. 171, 178; Ossipee Manf'g Co. v. Canney, 54 N. H. 295, 312, 313; Saunders v. Farmer, 62 N. H. 572; Jewell v. Gilbert, 64 N. H. 13, 18; Case v. Kelly, 133 U. S. 21, 28; Mor. Corp., ss. 744-755.

Judgment for the defendants.

Smith, J., did not sit: the others concurred.