History
  • No items yet
midpage
Elsher v. Hughes
60 N.H. 469
| N.H. | 1881
|
Check Treatment

The plaintiff is entitled to damages for the defendant's use and occupation of the plaintiff's store. The measure of damages given to the jury was the same as would have been given in assumpsit. Whether, upon the evidence in the case, the value of the occupation should be recovered in trespass or assumpsit, is an unnecessary question. Merrill v. Perkins,59 N.H. 343. When the plaintiff amends the declaration by adding a common count in assumpsit, there will be

Judgment on the verdict.

BLODGETT, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Elsher v. Hughes
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1881
Citation: 60 N.H. 469
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.