History
  • No items yet
midpage
Fitch v. Nute
62 N.H. 700
| N.H. | 1883
|
Check Treatment

ASSUMPSIT. The objection to the maintenance of the action was, that it was brought in the name of the wrong party. Without deciding the question raised, it was held that the writ might, if necessary, be amended at the trial term, and without terms.

Case discharged.

ALLEN, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Fitch v. Nute
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1883
Citation: 62 N.H. 700
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.