History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kelly v. Duff
61 N.H. 435
| N.H. | 1881
|
Check Treatment

Payment of a mortgage debt works a discharge or an assignment of the mortgage, as equity may require. Moore v. Beasom, 44 N.H. 215; Rigney v. Lovejoy, 13 N.H. 247, 252; Stantons v. Thompson, 49 N.H. 272, 279; Bacon v. Goodnow, 59 N.H. 415, 417. Whatever may have been the *Page 438 understanding of the plaintiff and the bank, justice requires that the mortgage should be considered as assigned to the plaintiff. Robinson v. Leavitt, 7 N.H. 73, 101; Johnson v. Elliot, 26 N.H. 67, 74; Bank v. Weeks,59 N.H. 239, 240; Drew v. Rust, 36 N.H. 335, 343. The objection, that if this action is in effect a proceeding to foreclose the mortgage the judgment would apply to a part only of the mortgaged premises, and that the part not included in the writ would be discharged from the mortgage lien, need not be considered, since the plaintiff may have leave to amend by including in his declaration the whole of the mortgaged land. The defendants' right to redeem is conceded by the plaintiff. There will be a conditional judgment for the plaintiff, and the right of Mary Duff to a homestead will be determined on her petition.

Case discharged.

ALLEN, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Kelly v. Duff
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1881
Citation: 61 N.H. 435
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.