History
  • No items yet
midpage
Warner Bank v. Clement & Co.
58 N.H. 533
| N.H. | 1879
|
Check Treatment

There is no doubt of the power of the court in any case, for sufficient cause, to bring forward an action and vacate the judgment rendered therein. Bellows v. Stone, 14 N.H. 175; Frink v. Frink, 43 N.H. 508; Hillsborough v. Nichols, 46 N.H. 379; Judge of Probate v. Webster, 46 N.H. 518; Stickney v. Davis, 17 Pick. 170; McClew v. Burt, 5 Met. 200.

What is sufficient cause is a question of fact, depending upon the particular circumstances of each case. These should be established by evidence at the trial term.

Case discharged.

FOSTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Warner Bank v. Clement & Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Mar 5, 1879
Citation: 58 N.H. 533
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.