History
  • No items yet
midpage
Howe v. Day
58 N.H. 516
| N.H. | 1879
|
Check Treatment

The items of the specification made an investigation of accounts necessary. The action was properly sent to an auditor, and *Page 517 the auditor's report was evidence for a jury. Doyle v. Doyle, 56 N.H. 567.

No action at law could be maintained on the special contract to convey land, which was not in writing and was within the statute of frauds; but the plaintiff was entitled to recover for the money expended, and what the labor and services performed under the contract were reasonably worth. Ham v. Goodrich, 37 N.H. 185.

Judgment on the verdict.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Howe v. Day
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Mar 5, 1879
Citation: 58 N.H. 516
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.