History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hussey v. Davis
58 N.H. 317
| N.H. | 1878
|
Check Treatment

No search-warrant can be lawfully issued but in cases and with the formalities prescribed by law. Bill of Rights, art. 19. The common law of search-warrants, affirmed in the Bill of Rights, is of extraordinary strictness. Cooley Const. Lim. 303; Cooley on Torts 295. The "warrant shall require the officer" "to make return of his proceedings thereon, with an inventory of such things sought as shall there be found, and of such things as, being liable to seizure, have been taken by him, and are in custody." Gen. St., c. 237, s. 3. In this case, as the warrant did not require the officer to make return of his proceedings or of an inventory, it is erroneous, and affords no justification to the defendant. Guenther v. Day, 6 Gray 490. He made return of his proceedings with the prescribed inventory: but the defect in the warrant was not cured by his doing what a valid warrant would have required him to do.

Case discharged.

FOSTER, J., did not sit. *Page 318

Case Details

Case Name: Hussey v. Davis
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1878
Citation: 58 N.H. 317
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.