History
  • No items yet
midpage
Page v. Hodgdon
63 N.H. 53
| N.H. | 1884
|
Check Treatment

The agreement of the parties, dividing the fence for the season, included an implied stipulation that each should maintain the part accepted by him. By the common law of New Hampshire, established by common custom and understanding, the unrescinded, oral contract, executed by one party, bound the other. The statute of fences does not expressly prohibit a parol division for the season; and the construction of the statute, settled by long usage, is, that it does not relieve the defendants from liability for the damage caused by the non-performance of their agreement.

Exception overruled.

BLODGETT, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Page v. Hodgdon
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1884
Citation: 63 N.H. 53
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.