Monroe v. Connecticut River Lumber Co.
32 A. 152
| N.H. | 1891|
Check TreatmentThe question of fact, whether Van Dyke was made a party for the sole purpose of preventing a removal of the action, etc., can finally be determined only by the federal court. Burlington, c., Railway Co. v. Dunn,
Case discharged.
SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 629
