History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harris v. Rounsevel
61 N.H. 250
| N.H. | 1881
|
Check Treatment

Sending the sacks for the wool was a preparation made by the plaintiffs for completing the purchase. The preparation was not beneficial to the defendant, was not a service for the payment of which his promise can be implied from the facts stated, and was not one of the statutory conditions that would give validity to the contract of sale. G. L., c. 220, s. 16; C. A. Association v. B. M. Railroad, 59 N.H. 312, 314. Notice may generally be waived. Lyman v. Littleton, 50 N.H. 42. In legal proceedings, a party may waive an objection by not presenting it seasonably. State v. Richmond,26 N.H. 232, 247; Boyce. v. Railroad, 43 N.H. 627. The defendant presented his defence in court at his first opportunity. The legislature intended that such a contract should not be valid, and that its invalidity should not be waived by such oral statements as were made in this case.

Case discharged.

STANLEY, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 254

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. Rounsevel
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1881
Citation: 61 N.H. 250
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.