History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pendexter v. Cate
66 N.H. 270
| N.H. | 1890
|
Check Treatment

The return of the officer that he "made service on the within named defendant by delivering a summons in hand for his appearance at court" was sufficient. It cannot, by any reasonable interpretation, be construed to mean a delivery in hand to any other person than the defendant.

As the court had jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the case and of the person of the defendant, the record is incontrovertible, and the judgment cannot be inquired into in this suit. Lawrence v. Smith,45 N.H. 533, 537; Fowler v. Brooks, 64 N.H. 423; McDonald v. Drew,64 N.H. 547.

Judgment for the plaintiffs.

BINGHAM, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 271

Case Details

Case Name: Pendexter v. Cate
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1890
Citation: 66 N.H. 270
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.