History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gregoire v. Allard
152 A. 489
| N.H. | 1930
|
Check Treatment

In accordance with the principles which were examined at length in McCurdy v. Flibotte, 83 N.H. 143, and which were recognized and applied in Herschensohn v. Weisman, 80 N.H. 557 and Lemire v. Pilawski, 77 N.H. 116, defendant's exceptions must be overruled. The defendant's answer to the question of the witness, in either of the forms which were findable upon the evidence, clearly imported an admission of excessive speed. It is difficult to see how this admission could, under the circumstances, have been separated from the reference to insurance, but however this may be, it is plain that the trial court was not asked to make the attempt and defendant's general exceptions are therefore unavailing. McCurdy v. Flibotte, supra.

Judgment on the verdict.

All concurred. *Page 475

Case Details

Case Name: Gregoire v. Allard
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 2, 1930
Citation: 152 A. 489
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.