History
  • No items yet
midpage
Athanasiou v. Roftsias
86 N.H. 595
| N.H. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

If the excluded evidence was relevant, it was within the trial court's discretion to exclude it for remoteness. As the exclusion may have been for this reason, the exception, being general, presents no legal question. Boulanger v. McQuesten, 79 N.H. 175, 176.

The case shows evidence warranting the argument excepted to.

Judgments on the verdicts.

WOODBURY, J., did not sit. *Page 596

Case Details

Case Name: Athanasiou v. Roftsias
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 29, 1933
Citation: 86 N.H. 595
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.