History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kelsea v. Manchester
64 N.H. 570
| N.H. | 1888
|
Check Treatment

The petitioner was not learned in the law, and employed counsel to manage his cause who omitted to file a claim for damages with the aldermen because he did not know that c. 65, Laws, 1885, required such claim to be filed with any other person than the city clerk. The plaintiff's ignorance of the law was due to no neglect or fault of his, but, being unlearned, he used ordinary care and prudence in employing counsel to file the claim. The case comes within the rule in Bolles v. Dalton, 59 N.H. 479.

Exception overruled.

DOE, C. J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 571

Case Details

Case Name: Kelsea v. Manchester
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1888
Citation: 64 N.H. 570
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.