George v. Morse & Malloy Shoe Co.
170 A. 776
| N.H. | 1934|
Check TreatmentLead Opinion
The case is governed by Thomson v. Company, ante, 436, decided this day.
In so far as the facts differ from those in the earlier case, they are not more favorable to the plaintiff.
Exception overruled.
BRANCH, J., did not sit: WOODBURY, J., concurred in the result: the others concurred.
Concurrence Opinion
I concur in the result upon the ground that the injury was foreseen, anticipated and not accidental. In so far as the doctrine upon which this case is disposed of is concerned I dissent for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion in Thomson v. Company. *Page 597
