History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lewis v. Boston & Maine Railroad
79 N.H. 165
| N.H. | 1919
|
Check Treatment

The plaintiff cannot recover unless he shows that the defendants were in fault. Hill v. Railroad, 77 N.H. 151. The evidence on which he relies to prove that fact is the testimony of several witnesses who saw a trainman entering the car from the vestibule just as the intestate began to rap on the vestibule door. This is insufficient to prove that they actually knew of it in time to prevent the accident. It cannot be found, therefore, that the defendants were in fault, for there is no evidence which even tends to prove that the defendants ought to have anticipated that the intestate might attempt to board the train when and as he did.

Exception overruled.

PLUMMER, J., was absent: the others concurred. *Page 166

Case Details

Case Name: Lewis v. Boston & Maine Railroad
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Mar 4, 1919
Citation: 79 N.H. 165
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.