History
  • No items yet
midpage
Durrell & A. v. Emery
64 N.H. 223
| N.H. | 1886
|
Check Treatment

There being no evidence of any contract, express or implied, between the plaintiffs and the defendant to pay for the occupation of the premises, or that the relation of landlord and tenant ever existed between them, the action cannot be maintained, and the motion for a nonsuit should have been granted.

Exception sustained.

CARPENTER, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Durrell & A. v. Emery
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1886
Citation: 64 N.H. 223
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.