History
  • No items yet
midpage
Merrill v. Perkins
61 N.H. 262
| N.H. | 1881
|
Check Treatment

The defendants' motion raised a question of fact to be determined at the trial term, and the case shows no error of law. Hovey v. Brown,59 N.H. 114; Smith v. Cushman, 59 N.H. 519; Gamsby v. Columbia, 58 N.H. 60; Daniels v. Lebanon, 58 N.H. 284; Burnham v. Butler, 58 N.H. 568; Wentworth v. Jefferson, 60 N.H. 158; Dodge v. Stickney, 60 N.H. 461; *Page 264 Hovey v. Morrill, 61 N.H. 9, 14; Chase v. Woodward, 61 N.H. 79; Whitcher v. Dexter, 61 N.H. 91; Garvin v. Legery, 61 N.H. 153.

Exception overruled.

STANLEY, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Merrill v. Perkins
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1881
Citation: 61 N.H. 262
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.