History
  • No items yet
midpage
Foster v. Bartlett
62 N.H. 617
| N.H. | 1883
|
Check Treatment

The plaintiff had his election to bring an action on the contract to recover damages for the breach of it, or to treat it as rescinded and recover the money as received to his use. Stevens v. Cushing, 1 N.H. 18; Drew v. Claggett, 39 N.H. 431, 433. The defendant's payment of $200 affords no objection to the plaintiff's pursuing the last named course. The defendant is not injured by the rescission. Notwithstanding his partial performance of his agreement, he is restored to the situation he occupied before the contract was made. Luey v. Bundy, 9 N.H. 298, 302, 303; King v. Hutchins, 28 N.H. 561, 573.

Judgment on the verdict.

STANLEY. J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Foster v. Bartlett
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1883
Citation: 62 N.H. 617
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.