History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dow v. Electric Co.
43 A. 618
| N.H. | 1898
|
Check Treatment

The high-water mark on fresh-water rivers is not the highest point to which the stream rises in times of freshets, but is "the line which the river impresses upon the soil by covering it for sufficient periods to deprive it of vegetation and to destroy its value for agriculture." Gould Wat., s. 45; Howard v. Ingersoll, 13 How. 381; In re Minnetonka Lake,56 Minn. 513; Houghton v. Railroad, 47 Ia. 370. The instructions to the jury were in accordance with this principle.

Exception overruled.

PIKE, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Dow v. Electric Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1898
Citation: 43 A. 618
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.