History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gurnsey v. Keene
34 A. 742
| N.H. | 1894
|
Check Treatment

"If no sufficient objection is made, all petitions relating to highways shall be referred to the county commissioners." P. S., c. 68, s. 5. If, upon a trial of the issue raised by the answer, it should be found that the new highway is laid over an old one, the finding would be a sufficient objection to sending the petition to the commissioners. The plaintiff's would be entitled to no damages (Pierce v. Somersworth, 10 N.H. 369), and their petition would be dismissed. If it should be found that there was no existing highway where the new one is laid, the petition must be referred to the commissioners. On the return of their report the plaintiff's would be entitled to, and in order to obtain their rights might be obliged to have, another trial. P. S., c. 68, s. 10. They might thus be subjected to the expense and delay of two trials where one would suffice. What method of procedure in the trial of the several issues presented will be most convenient, expeditious, and least expensive to the parties, is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term. Owen v. Weston, 63 N.H. 599.

Case discharged.

All concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Gurnsey v. Keene
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1894
Citation: 34 A. 742
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.