History
  • No items yet
midpage
Annis v. Gleason
56 N.H. 16
| N.H. | 1875
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

FROM MERRIMACK CIRCUIT COURT. By Ch. 207, sec. 16, Gen. Stats., additional plaintiffs may be made parties to the action on such terms as the court shall order. I can see no reason why the amendment desired should not be made, and judgment rendered according to the report. The statute providing for such references, ch. 97, sec. 13, Laws of 1874, authorizes the court to render judgment on the report of the referee, which appears to be just what the court has done in this case. The exception, therefore, must be overruled.






Concurrence Opinion

I am of the same opinion. The statute is as plain as the English language can make it; and I must say, that I think the time of the court ought not to be occupied with such frivolous questions, nor ought the state to be put to the expense of printing them in the reports.

*RAND, J., C. C. I concur. The matter is too plain to be discussed.

Exceptions overruled.

* SMITH, J., did not sit. *Page 17

Case Details

Case Name: Annis v. Gleason
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Aug 13, 1875
Citation: 56 N.H. 16
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.