History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ossipee v. Grant
59 N.H. 70
| N.H. | 1879
|
Check Treatment

The question which the defendant desired to ask did not relate to errors in the account in controversy, but in other accounts. Its purpose was to test the correctness of the bookkeeper. When a book account is proved, and the accuracy of the bookkeeper is involved, it is not error of law to allow other accounts in the same book to be introduced in impeachment of his accuracy: but how much time will be profitably and properly spent on the collateral inquiry is a question of fact to be determined at the trial term.

The request for instructions was properly denied.

Judgment on the verdict.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Ossipee v. Grant
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1879
Citation: 59 N.H. 70
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.