History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lane v. Barron
64 N.H. 277
| N.H. | 1886
|
Check Treatment

The defendant is sued as endorser of notes which, within six years, he promised to pay. The notes were payable to a firm of which he was a member, and were endorsed by the firm, and also by him. If the action is brought against him as surviving partner, another count, declaring against him as an individual endorser, will justly dispose of the question of the capacity in which he made the new promise. The plaintiff's foreclosure of the mortgage by which the notes were secured was a payment to the amount of the value of the land. Dearborn v. Nelson, 61 N.H. 249; Fletcher v. Chamberlin,61 N.H. 438, 493, 494. The value is a matter of fact to be determined at the trial term. The debt is not barred by the statute of limitations. There is nothing to avoid the new and absolute promise.

Case discharged.

SMITH, J., did not sit: the others concurred. *Page 278

Case Details

Case Name: Lane v. Barron
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Dec 5, 1886
Citation: 64 N.H. 277
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.