History
  • No items yet
midpage
Skavina v. Skavina
41 A.2d 611
| N.H. | 1945
|
Check Treatment

The petition alleges sufficient grounds for annulment. However, we deem it inexpedient to consider at this time the numerous allegations of fraud, some of which may not be sustained by the evidence. The contention that the plaintiff does not come into equity with "clean hands" is not conclusive. See 16 Minn. Law Rev. 215.

Exception sustained.

BRANCH, J., was absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Skavina v. Skavina
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Mar 6, 1945
Citation: 41 A.2d 611
Docket Number: No. 3518.
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.