If the language the testator used is given its ordinary meaning, his controling purpose in making this bequest was to dispose of his property in such a way that it would prove a "lasting benefit" to the inhabitants of the parish and in that way perpetuate his memory and that of his family. The provision that the money be used to build a church to be known by his name is merely the scheme he devised to effectuate that purpose. The property therefore was not given to the parish on condition that it build a church to be known by the testator's name, but was given to it in trust to be used for the benefit of the inhabitants. Such a bequest, — one intended to benefit the inhabitants of the world, Fernald v. Church,
Case discharged.
All concurred. *Page 329
