History
  • No items yet
midpage
Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway
59 N.H. 215
| N.H. | 1879
|
Check Treatment

For some purposes, a review is a new action. Haven v. Libbey, Smith (N.H.) 109; Barker v. Barker, 39 N.H. 408, 409; Cahoon v. Coe, 57 N.H. 556,599; Camp v. Hilliard, 58 N.H. 42; Page v. Brewster, 58 N.H. 126. But it is settled that the right of review in such cases as this is not affected by c. 64 of Laws of 1878. Rowell v. B. M. R. R., ante, p. 35.

Motion granted.

STANLEY, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Paine v. Grand Trunk Railway
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Jun 5, 1879
Citation: 59 N.H. 215
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.