History
  • No items yet
midpage
Dame v. Wood
66 A. 484
| N.H. | 1907
|
Check Treatment

It can be found from the fact that a person fails to act because of a mistake of his counsel, that he was prevented from acting by accident, mistake, or misfortune (Grout v. Cole, 57 N.H. 547; Bolles v. Dalton,59 N.H. 479; 480; Kelsea v. Manchester, 64 N.H. 570; Harvey v. Northwood,65 N.H. 117; Cossar v. Truesdale, 69 N.H. 490; Parsons v. Durham,70 N.H. 44; Gunnison v. Abbott, 73 N.H. 590, 592); so there was evidence to sustain the court's finding, which is the only question of law raised by the defendant's exception.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Dame v. Wood
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Apr 2, 1907
Citation: 66 A. 484
Court Abbreviation: N.H.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.