History
  • No items yet
midpage
Garred v. Garred
51 Nev. 335
| Nev. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

OPINION
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal taken from a judgment and from an order denying a new trial in the divorce action of U.A. Garred, Plaintiff, v. Elizabeth H. Garred, Defendant.

After consideration of the entire record, the motion to dismiss the appeal from the order must be sustained for the following reason: The record on appeal contains no bill of exceptions settled and allowed by the judge or court or by stipulation of the parties within the time required by the statute, or at all. Stats. 1923, p. 163, c. 97. See Barbash v. Pitt, 48 Nev. 108, 227 P. 1018, 233 P. 844, 236 P. 1101; Shirk v. Palmer, 48 Nev. 451, 232 P. 1083, 236 P. 678, 239 P. 1000; Water Co. of *Page 336 Tonopah v. Tonopah Belmont Development Co., 49 Nev. 172,241 P. 1079; Markwell v. Gray, 50 Nev. 427, 265 P. 705.

Finding no error upon the face of the judgment roll, the judgment appealed from is sustained.

Case Details

Case Name: Garred v. Garred
Court Name: Nevada Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 13, 1929
Citation: 51 Nev. 335
Docket Number: 2852
Court Abbreviation: Nev.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.