Dear Representative Stoner:
This opinion is in response to your question asking:
"Does Section
8.120 of the Comprehensive Election Act of 1977 repeal by implication that portion of Section94.510 RSMo. with respect to language required for a ballot for a City Sales Tax Election?"
You also state:
"The City of Springfield, Missouri, proposes to submit a Sales Tax Election to the voters in the near future. I am informed by the City Attorney that in the preparation of the ballot for the City Clerk of the City of Springfield, Missouri, that a question arose concerning an apparent conflict between Sec.
8.120 of the Comprehensive Election Act of 1977 and Section94.510 RSMo."
Section
For the sales tax
Against the sales tax
The 1977 amendment did not change the language in question.
Section
"1. All questions printed on the official ballot shall be phrased in such a manner that the required response is a `YES' or a `NO'. Immediately beside or below each question, a `YES' and a `NO' shall be printed, immediately followed by a square, the sides of which are not less than one-fourth inch in length. Beneath the question and the `YES' and `NO' the following instruction shall be printed: `If you are in favor of the question, place an X in the box opposite "YES". If you are opposed to the question, place an X in the box opposite "NO".'
"2. When the secretary of state certifies a question to be submitted to a vote of the people, he shall include in his certification the exact wording of the question and the instructions. The wording certified by the secretary of state shall be printed on the official ballot, and no other wording shall be used to submit the question."
Likewise, Section
"(22) `Question' means any measure on the ballot which can be voted `YES' or `NO';"
Section
We note that House Bill No. 971, Second Regular Session, 79th General Assembly, which has not as yet been passed, will if enacted specifically repeal and re-enact Section
"The question shall be submitted in substantially the following form:
Shall there be a city sales tax?"
In our Opinion No. 228, dated November 14, 1977, to McCuskey, this office concluded that the Comprehensive Election Act repealed by implication contrary provisions of Section
For the reasons stated in that opinion and in light of the legislative history of the provisions you question, we conclude that the provisions of the Comprehensive Election Act govern and the ballot should be worded to conform to the provisions of Section
CONCLUSION
It is the opinion of this office that Section
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by my assistant, John C. Klaffenbach.
Very truly yours,
JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General
Enclosure Op. No. 228, 11-14-77, McCuskey
