Dear Mr. Swischer:
This opinion is in response to your inquiry as to the amount of fees an ex officio collector of a third class county adopting township organization may receive and keep as a part of his salary for taxes collected. Specifically, you ask whether delinquent taxes should be included when computing the total amount of taxes levied for any one year in determining the compensation of an ex officio collector.
In pertinent part, Section
Other provisions of law to the contrary notwithstanding, the total compensation of ex officio collectors shall not exceed the sum of ten thousand dollars annually, which maximum amounts shall include the costs of any deputy or assistants employed; except that, in all counties wherein the total amount levied for any one year exceeds two million dollars and is less than four million dollars, the ex officio collector shall present for allowance proper vouchers for all disbursements made by him on account of salaries and expenses of his office and other costs of collecting revenue, which shall be allowed as against the commissions collected by him; and out of the residue of commissions in his hands, after deducting the amounts so allowed, the ex officio collector may retain a compensation for his services not to exceed ten thousand dollars per year; and except that, the maximum compensation herein provided shall not be applicable to ex officio collectors in counties wherein the total amount levied, for any one year exceeds four million dollars. The limitation on the amount to be retained as herein provided applies to fees and commissions on current taxes, but does not apply to commissions on the collection of back and delinquent taxes and ditch and levee taxes.
It has been suggested that delinquent taxes should be included in determining whether the total amount levied for any one year exceeds four million dollars, and where this is so, the compensation limitations are not applicable. We disagree. In dealing with the question of commissions to be paid a county collector, the Missouri Supreme Court has said that statutes authorizing fees and commissions are to be strictly construed against the collector. Kirkpatrick v.Rose,
It is apparent from the language of Section
CONCLUSION
It is the opinion of this office that in determining the compensation of an ex officio collector of a third class township county the total amount levied for any one year calculated under Section
The foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve, was prepared by my assistant, Richard L. Wieler.
Very truly yours,
JOHN ASHCROFT Attorney General
