History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burk v. Burk
1931 Mo. App. LEXIS 103
| Mo. Ct. App. | 1931
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

Action for divorce.

Upon trial in the court below, decree was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant. Defendant appeals.

It appears from the abstract of the record furnished by defendant that motion for new trial has not been preserved in a bill of exceptions. There is therefore nothing before us for review, except the record proper, in which there is no claim of error. [Roden v. Helm, 192 Mo. 71, 81, 90 S.W. 798.]

The judgment is affirmed. Boyer, C., concurs.






Addendum

The foregoing opinion by CAMPBELL, C., is adopted as the opinion of the court. The judgment is affirmed. All concur, except Trimble, P.J., absent.

Case Details

Case Name: Burk v. Burk
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 4, 1931
Citation: 1931 Mo. App. LEXIS 103
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.