History
  • No items yet
midpage
Starks v. Lusk
216 S.W. 1119
| Mo. | 1919
|
Check Treatment

This case is fully stated and elaborately discussed in the majority and dissenting opinions of the Springfield Court of Appeals (187 S.W. 586 et seq).

After a careful examination of the facts as shown in the record, we are satisfied that a correct conclusion was reached in the majority opinion. We therefore approve the majority opinion of the Springfield Court of Appeals.

The judgment of the circuit court is, therefore, affirmed. It is so ordered. All concur, except Goode and Graves, JJ., who dissent; Woodson, J., absent. *Page 269

Case Details

Case Name: Starks v. Lusk
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Dec 22, 1919
Citation: 216 S.W. 1119
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.