History
  • No items yet
midpage
United States v. William W. Holland
565 F.2d 383
| 5th Cir. | 1978
|
Check Treatment

565 F.2d 383

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
William W. HOLLAND, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 76-3763.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 4, 1978.

Sterling G. Culpepper, Jr. (Court-Appointed), Charles S. Coody, Montgomery, Ala., for defendant-appellant.

Barry E. Teague, U. S. Atty., Milton L. Moss, Asst. U. S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, MORGAN, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

The mandate of the court having prematurely issued incident to the panel opinion and having properly been complied with by the district court, and the cause having thereafter been voted en banc by the court,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the mandate herein remain undisturbed, that the opinion of the panel, reported at 552 F.2d 667, be withdrawn, and that the en banc court be dissolved.

Case Details

Case Name: United States v. William W. Holland
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Jan 4, 1978
Citation: 565 F.2d 383
Docket Number: 76-3763
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.