In its facts and applicable law, this case is precisely like that of First National Bank of Wyandotte v. Detroit CommonCouncil. The decision in that case reported ante, 89, is controlling of the questions here involved.

The writ of mandamus is denied.

BUTZEL, C.J., and WIEST, CLARK, SHARPE, NORTH, and FEAD, JJ., concurred. POTTER, J., did not sit. *Page 98