History
  • No items yet
midpage
State v. Hughes
106 So. 566
| La. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

The appellant was indicted, prosecuted, convicted, and sentenced for selling intoxicating liquor in violation of the Hood Act (Act No. 39 of Ex. Sess. 1921). From conviction and sentence he appealed.

There are no bills of exception in the record, no assignments of error, no error patent on the face of the record, and appellant has not filed a brief. Therefore nothing is presented for our consideration. State v. Gebbia, 121 La. 1083, 47 So. 32; State v. Pullen, 130 La. 249, 57 So. 906; State v. William,130 La. 283, 57 So. 927; State v. Abrams, 151 La. 623, 92 So. 138.

The verdict, judgment, and sentence are affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: State v. Hughes
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Nov 30, 1925
Citation: 106 So. 566
Docket Number: No. 27584.
Court Abbreviation: La.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.