Dear Senator Wilson:
You inquire whether certain Kansas municipalities may contract with municipalities in other states to pool their liabilities for the lines of insurance listed in K.S.A.
The Kansas Municipal Group-Funded Pool Act,2
(Group-Funded Pool Act), enacted in 1987,3 was designed to assist municipalities in addressing "skyrocketing"4
liability premiums and the dearth of private insurance companies available to satisfy insurance needs by authorizing local units of government to create insurance and risk management pools.5 K.S.A.
"Five or more municipalities as defined in K.S.A.
75-6102 . . . may enter into agreements to pool their liabilities for Kansas fire, marine, inland marine and allied lines . . . casualty, surety and fidelity lines . . . including workers' compensation and employers' liability. Such pools shall not include accident, health or life insurance. Such arrangements shall be known as group-funded pools, which shall not be deemed to be insurance or insurance companies and shall not be subject to the provisions of chapter 40 of the Kansas Statutes Annotated, except as otherwise provided herein."6
K.S.A. 2005 Supp.
The mechanism generally used by municipalities for this purpose is the Interlocal Cooperation Act.10 The Interlocal Cooperation Act allows public agencies to exercise their powers jointly and to create separate legal entities to conduct the joint venture.11 While the Interlocal Cooperation Act defines a "public agency" to include a municipality in another state,12 a Kansas municipality would be precluded from entering into an interlocal cooperation agreement with a municipality in another state unless the group-funded pool complies with the Group-Funded Pool Act.13
In 1990, three years after the enactment of the Group-Funded Pool Act, the restriction on pooling accident, health, and life insurance was removed.14 However, because the Group-Funded Pool Act was restricted to Kansas municipalities, some Kansas municipalities urged the Legislature to adopt legislation that would allow them to enter into agreements with municipalities in other states to pool their sickness and accident related liabilities.15
Testimony from city officials from the cities of Merriam, Fairway, and Basehor revealed that 13 Kansas municipalities had previously entered into a group-funded health insurance pool with municipalities in Missouri.16 The reasons for doing so focused on the difficulty in finding private insurance companies willing to provide a quote for health insurance for city employees because of the number of employees and/or the experience of the city.17
Concerned because the Kansas Insurance Department had advised that K.S.A.
The cities' efforts were successful and the result was K.S.A.
"Notwithstanding the provisions of [the Group-Funded Pool Act] . . . any municipalities as defined in K.S.A.
75-6102 . . . located in and including Douglas, Johnson, Leavenworth, Miami and Wyandotte counties, may qualify to enter into agreements to pool their sickness and accident related liabilities in accordance with K.S.A12-2617 et seq. . . . with municipalities located in other states if such a pool was formed on or before January 1, 1990. Any investments held by such pool shall be held in an entity described in K.S.A.12-2622 and amendments thereto. In the event the law or laws of any other state in which a member of the pool is located are inconsistent with or contrary to any provision of K.S.A.12-2617 through12-2626 ,12-2628 and12-2629 and amendments thereto, the law of the state with the more stringent requirement shall apply."
K.S.A.
In light of the legislative history and the plain language of both K.S.A.
Sincerely,
Phill Kline Attorney General
Mary Feighny Assistant Attorney General
PK:JLM:MF:jm
L. 1990, Ch.
L. 1987, Ch.
