The Honorable Michael R. O'Neal State Representative, One Hundred Fourth District Box 2977 Hutchinson, Kansas 67504
Dear Representative O'Neal:
As representative for the one hundred fourth district you inquire whether K.S.A.
In pertinent part the practice of land surveying is defined to include:
"(3) the preparation of the original descriptions of real property for the conveyance of or recording thereof and the preparation of maps, plats and field note records that represent these surveys; . . ."
You indicate that a constituent has contacted you about a title company which has construed this provision to mean that land surveyors are theonly individuals now allowed to create original land descriptions. You are concerned that this interpretation would make it unlawful for a farmer, for example, to deed part of his property to a son or daughter, where the deed contains a description of the property conveyed which is "new," if he prepares the deed himself, or has an attorney or other agent do so without engaging a land surveyor.
At issue is whether any original division of land (that has previously existed as one unit) results in an original description which must be prepared by a licensed land surveyor.
The term "original description" was interpreted in Attorney General Opinion No. 78-59 issued in 1978 under the prior administration of Curt T. Schneider. The opinion interprets K.S.A. 1977 Supp.
The opinion makes a distinction between two general categories of division of property: a fractional division and a measured division. A fractional division of a parcel is one that can be described fractionally, such as "the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 15, Township 29 South, Range 5 West, Balderdash County, Kansas".See
Attorney General Opinion No. 78-59 uses subdivision plats and city lots as examples of these two general categories of division of land. Subdivision plats are required by K.S.A.
In summation we concur with the analysis in Attorney General Opinion 78-59. The opinion, however, concludes that whether a particular description is an "original description for conveyance or recording" is to be determined by the use of the description. We find this conclusion, at best, confusing and at worst, ambiguous. For this reason we concur with the opinion's analysis and synopsis, its conclusion notwithstanding. In our opinion an original division of land and its resulting land description does not always constitute an original land description. An original land description as that term is used in K.S.A.
Very truly yours,
ROBERT T. STEPHAN Attorney General of Kansas
Guen Easley Assistant Attorney General
RTS:JLM:GE:jm
