The Honorable Alex Scott State Representative, 65th District State Capitol, Room 171-W Topeka, Kansas 66612
Dear Representative Scott:
You request our opinion regarding the constitutionality of requiring individuals who purchase vehicles in taxing districts in this state with lower local sales taxes than the taxing district in which they reside to pay the difference to the resident taxing district. You state that under the system you propose, residence would determine the charge for the local tax. "An individual who lived where the tax was equal or less than where the purchase took place would not pay more tax. Likewise, a person who purchased in a higher sales tax county, but lived in a lower sales tax jurisdiction would not receive a refund." But a person who purchased a vehicle in a city or county with a lower sales tax than that of the county where the person lives would pay the county or city of residence the difference between the tax paid on the purchase and the amount that would have been imposed had the purchase occurred in the person's city or county of residence.
Pursuant to K.S.A.
The Kansas compensating tax, K.S.A.
The Kansas compensating tax act has survived challenges to its constitutionality that were based on the interstate commerce clause.J.G. Masonry, Inc. v. Department of Revenue,
In conclusion, the legislature may, by statute, authorize imposition of a local use tax on motor vehicles in an attempt to equalize the effect of local sales taxes.
Very truly yours,
ROBERT T. STEPHAN Attorney General of Kansas
Julene L. Miller Deputy Attorney General
RTS:JLM:jm
