History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Ex Rel. Lasalle Extension University v. Pyle
227 Ind. 263
| Ind. | 1949
|
Check Treatment

This is an original action wherein the relator seeks to mandate the respondent to reinstate certain proceedings supplemental to execution which are being prosecuted in respondent's court.

The relator has described the respondent in the caption of his petition as an individual. There are sufficient allegations in the petition, however, to indicate that the action is 1. brought against the respondent as Judge of the St. Joseph Circuit Court. We will, therefore, disregard this irregularity.

It is alleged in this petition that the respondent has "revoked and nullified said proceedings." It is not clear what is meant by this allegation. There is attached to said petition, 2. however, a certified copy of the record of all the proceedings referred to in same, and from this record it appears that these proceedings have not been in any manner, altered, modified, changed, revoked or nullified. In other words, relator's petition is contrary to the records of the court which is attached thereto. Under these circumstances we are bound by the record, as it imports verity. State ex rel. Thompson v.Rhoads (1946), 224 Ind. 136, 65 N.E.2d 248.

Relator's petition is, therefore, denied.

NOTE. — Reported in 85 N.E.2d 629. *Page 265

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Lasalle Extension University v. Pyle
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 4, 1949
Citation: 227 Ind. 263
Docket Number: No. 28,554.
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.