History
  • No items yet
midpage
Millikin v. Lantz
196 Ind. 653
| Ind. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

This is an appeal in a drainage proceeding. In the lower court, the appellant filed a supplemental petition, which, on the separate motion of the appellee Amos B. Lantz, and the separate motion of the original petitioners for the drain, was dismissed. On appeal, appellant named as appellees in the assignment of errors, "Grant Crumpacker, ____ Crumpacker, whose names appear in the Record as Crumpacker Brothers for and on behalf of the Original Petitioners." Said original petitioners are not named as appellees. They should have been so named instead of their attorneys. Rule 6, Rules of the Supreme and Appellate Courts of Indiana; Ewbank, Manual of Practice § 149; Abshire v.Williamson (1898), 149 Ind. 248, 252, 48 N.E. 1027; Prough v.Prough (1910), 174 Ind. 57, 91 N.E. 337.

Appellees have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. *Page 654 Same is sustained because the proper parties, the original petitioners, are not named as appellees. It is not necessary to notice other causes for dismissal set out in said motion.

Case Details

Case Name: Millikin v. Lantz
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Jun 2, 1925
Citation: 196 Ind. 653
Docket Number: No. 24,773.
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.