History
  • No items yet
midpage
Leighty v. Renbarger
116 Ind. App. 620
| Ind. Ct. App. | 1946
|
Check Treatment

Appellee has filed herein a motion to dismiss this appeal on the ground that no question for review has been presented.

The error relied upon for reversal is the overruling of appellants' motion for a new trial which attempts to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence and the legality of the decision. But appellants' brief does not contain the pleadings, the motion for a new trial, the judgment, nor a statement of the evidence in narrative form. No question is therefore presented. Rule 2-17, Rules of Supreme Court.

Appeal dismissed.

NOTE. — Reported in 65 N.E.2d 637.

Case Details

Case Name: Leighty v. Renbarger
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 28, 1946
Citation: 116 Ind. App. 620
Docket Number: No. 17,469.
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.