History
  • No items yet
midpage
Melvin v. Hamilton, Admr.
101 Ind. App. 456
| Ind. Ct. App. | 1936
|
Check Treatment

This is an attempted appeal from a judgment of the Franklin Circuit Court. The sole error assigned for reversal is the overruling of appellant's motion for a new trial. The appellants have failed to set out a copy of their motion for a new trial or the substance thereof in their brief. The brief also fails to show that any time was given in which to file a bill of exceptions containing the evidence and proceedings of the trial court or that any bill of exceptions approved by such court was ever filed and made a part of the record. Thus no question is presented for our consideration. State ex rel. v. Hinds (1929), 200 Ind. 613, 165 N.E. 754; United Paperboard Co. v.Muncie, etc., Co. (1926), 84 Ind. App. 333, 151 N.E. 365;Indiana Service Corporation v. Daily (1928), 87 Ind. App. 6,159 N.E. 767; Rule 21, Supreme and Appellate Courts.

The death of appellee having been suggested the judgment is affirmed as of date of submission. *Page 458

Case Details

Case Name: Melvin v. Hamilton, Admr.
Court Name: Indiana Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 6, 1936
Citation: 101 Ind. App. 456
Docket Number: No. 15,194.
Court Abbreviation: Ind. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.