History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Ex Rel. Tonan v. Bottorff, Judge
219 Ind. 26
| Ind. | 1941
|
Check Treatment

The relator alleges that he is serving a sentence of life imprisonment upon a conviction of kidnapping; that he filed a petition for a writ of error coram nobis in the Clark Circuit Court, in which he was convicted, but that the judge of said court has refused to act upon his petition. In a verified return it appears that, while a petition was filed, there has never been a request that it be assigned for trial.

It is a common practice in many of our courts of general jurisdiction that causes are not assigned for trial until a request for an assignment is made, and, under such circumstances, it cannot be said that the court has refused a trial. This court will not mandate the trial court to perform some duty which it has not been requested to perform.

Petition for writ of mandate denied.

NOTE. — Reported in 36 N.E.2d 766. *Page 28

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Tonan v. Bottorff, Judge
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 7, 1941
Citation: 219 Ind. 26
Docket Number: No. 27,615.
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.