History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Ex Rel. Wheelock v. Wiles, Judge
224 Ind. 239
| Ind. | 1946
|
Check Treatment

This is an original action wherein relator asks this court to mandate respondent to appoint attorneys to prosecute an appeal for relator from a judgment in a coram nobis proceeding.

Under State ex rel. Cutsinger v. Spencer, Judge (1941),219 Ind. 148, 41 N.E.2d 601; State ex rel. Sawa v. CriminalCourt of Lake County (1941), 220 Ind. 4, 50 N.E.2d 971;State ex rel. Barnes v. Howard (1946), ante, p. 107,65 N.E.2d 55, relator is not entitled to have counsel appointed by this court to prosecute such appeal. The legislature has provided a public defender to represent relator and for him to appeal in proper cases from coram nobis judgments. Acts of 1945, ch. 38.

Relator therefore is not entitled to the relief asked and said petition should be and is hereby denied. *Page 240

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Wheelock v. Wiles, Judge
Court Name: Indiana Supreme Court
Date Published: May 9, 1946
Citation: 224 Ind. 239
Docket Number: No. 28,185.
Court Abbreviation: Ind.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.