History
  • No items yet
midpage
Richter v. Fox Packing Co.
361 Ill. 421
| Ill. | 1935
|
Check Treatment

Appellant's action in the court below was one for damages, brought under paragraph (a) of section 15 of the Occupational Diseases act for certain alleged violations of section 1 of the same act. (Laws of 1911, p. 330; Smith's Stat. 1933, p. 1401; Cahill's Stat. 1933, p. 1375.) Motions to dismiss were filed by the various defendants upon many different grounds, among them being the contention that section 1 of the act above mentioned contravenes the constitution of this State. The trial court agreed with this contention and sustained all of the motions to dismiss. This appeal from a judgment entered in accordance with the court's ruling on the motions to dismiss comes directly to this court upon constitutional grounds.

Section 1 of the Occupational Diseases act was held to be unconstitutional in the cases of Parks v. Libby-Owens-FordGlass Co. 360 Ill. 130, Boshuizen v. Thompson *Page 422 Taylor Co. 360 id. 160, Vallat v. Radium Dial Co. 360 id. 407, and Novarro v. Illinois Steel Co. 360 id. 483. The judgment of the circuit court is in accordance with our holdings in these cases, and there appears to be no reason for re-examining the question. That judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Richter v. Fox Packing Co.
Court Name: Illinois Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 24, 1935
Citation: 361 Ill. 421
Docket Number: No. 23040. Judgment affirmed.
Court Abbreviation: Ill.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.