History
  • No items yet
midpage
Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Carter
295 P. 431
| Idaho | 1931
|
Check Treatment

The appeal is from an order denying a motion for change of venue. In addition to the merits various procedural motions have been interposed by both parties, including a motion to dismiss the appeal filed by appellants, asking that no costs be allowed in the event of the dismissal.

It appears that the appellants are or were public officials sued only in their official capacity. There is no cross-appeal and respondent does not object to the motion to dismiss the appeal. Therefore the appeal is dismissed. (4 C. J. 563.) No costs awarded. (Chicago, M. St. P. Ry. Co. v. PublicUtilities Com., 47 Idaho 346, 275 P. 780, at 781; 36 Cyc. 923.)

Lee, C. J., Varian and McNaughton, JJ., and Koelsch, D.J., concur. *Page 269

Case Details

Case Name: Twin Falls Canal Co. v. Carter
Court Name: Idaho Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 21, 1931
Citation: 295 P. 431
Docket Number: No. 5498.
Court Abbreviation: Idaho
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.