History
  • No items yet
midpage
Evans v. Union Pac. R. Co.
1939 Ida. LEXIS 23
| Idaho | 1939
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

This is a companion case to Whiffin v. Union Pacific RailroadCompany et al., 60 Idaho 141, 89 P.2d 540, the only difference being that herein Mrs. Evans was a guest in the automobile. No separate briefs were filed or assignments of error furnished, and, counsel being willing to let this case rest entirely upon the disposition of Whiffin v. Union PacificRailroad Company et al., we are likewise, indicating nothing in regard to any points that might have been raised for or against appellant herein as a guest.

Upon the authority of Whiffin v. Union Pacific RailroadCompany et al., ante, p. 141, 89 P.2d 540, the judgment is affirmed.

Costs awarded to respondents.

Ailshie, C.J., and Budge, J., concur.






Dissenting Opinion

For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion inWhiffin v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al., ante, p. 141,89 P.2d 540, I dissent from the decision in this case.

Justice Holden concurs in this dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: Evans v. Union Pac. R. Co.
Court Name: Idaho Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 6, 1939
Citation: 1939 Ida. LEXIS 23
Docket Number: No. 6628.
Court Abbreviation: Idaho
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.