1. "A specific intent to murder is an essential ingredient of the crime of assault with intent to murder: and where one is charged, as principal in the second degree, with assault with intent to murder, he can not *Page 509
be convicted unless it be shown that he not only aided in the act. but also participated in the murderous design." Kimball
v. State,
2. The sole assignment of error is the refusal of a new trial, the motion for which is based on the general grounds only, and the evidence being sufficient to support the verdict — that Cawthon was the actual perpetrator of the crime (assault with intent to murder), and that Fleming was present, aiding and abetting the act to be done — and the verdict having the approval of the trial judge, the judgment refusing a new trial is affirmed.
The jury were authorized to find that the turning of the light (from the spotlight on the sheriff's car) into the defendant's car, and the turning on of the siren was the customary way for an officer to signal an automobile moving on the highway at night to stop; and to further find that the sheriff wished to question the occupants of the automobile as to the apparent over-loaded condition of the car, and not to search it without first obtaining a search warrant, or to make any illegal arrest; that there was no attempt made to search the car; that no words were passed; that no attempt was made to arrest anyone, and that no act of the sheriff, or the occupants of his car, gave either Fleming or Cawthon the right to believe that an unlawful search of Fleming's car was to be made, or that it was about to be seized, and that when Cawthon fired his loaded shotgun twice into the sheriff's car, he did so with the intent to kill; that Fleming knew from the statements Cawthon made immediately preceding the shots that he intended to shoot, and shoot to kill. This, coupled with Fleming's assistance in rolling down the window, through which the shots passed, and leaning forward over the steering wheel so that the gun could be pointed and fired at the occupants of the sheriff's car just as it came alongside and stopped, also authorized the jury to find that Fleming aided in the act, and participated in the crime charged, including the intent to kill. We think that the evidence authorized the verdict that Fleming was guilty of an assault with intent to murder, in that he was present aiding and abetting Cawthon, who was the principal in the first degree. See in this connection,Middlebrooks v. State,
Judgment affirmed. Broyles, C. J., and Gardner, J., concur. *Page 512
